<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Exposure 5 Quick Start with Tony Sweet	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://exposure.software/blog/2013/exposure-5-quick-start-with-tony-sweet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://exposure.software/blog/2013/exposure-5-quick-start-with-tony-sweet/</link>
	<description>Simple Tools. Simply Beautiful.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 17:14:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Robert		</title>
		<link>https://exposure.software/blog/2013/exposure-5-quick-start-with-tony-sweet/#comment-11830</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 18:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.alienskin.com/?p=7767#comment-11830</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://exposure.software/blog/2013/exposure-5-quick-start-with-tony-sweet/#comment-11825&quot;&gt;Eddie Kiplinger&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi Eddie,

One thing that I will point out that is far better than Lightroom is our grain production. It is one of my favorite features. It produces more realistic grain than any other product I have personally used. While there are things that you can do in Lightroom to produce similar images, Exposure was designed to take a lot of the hard work out and speed up your workflow, but it is not a full featured imaging tool like Lightroom. I totally understand how you could feel the way you do, but I thought I would point out a couple differences, though there are several. 

Best regards,
Robert Lounsberry]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://exposure.software/blog/2013/exposure-5-quick-start-with-tony-sweet/#comment-11825">Eddie Kiplinger</a>.</p>
<p>Hi Eddie,</p>
<p>One thing that I will point out that is far better than Lightroom is our grain production. It is one of my favorite features. It produces more realistic grain than any other product I have personally used. While there are things that you can do in Lightroom to produce similar images, Exposure was designed to take a lot of the hard work out and speed up your workflow, but it is not a full featured imaging tool like Lightroom. I totally understand how you could feel the way you do, but I thought I would point out a couple differences, though there are several. </p>
<p>Best regards,<br />
Robert Lounsberry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Eddie Kiplinger		</title>
		<link>https://exposure.software/blog/2013/exposure-5-quick-start-with-tony-sweet/#comment-11825</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eddie Kiplinger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 16:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.alienskin.com/?p=7767#comment-11825</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[So, it would appear to me, that even though there are some great options to use with Exposure 5, I think other than the scratchy film presets, everything shown can just as easily be accomplished using Lightroom. Anytime I&#039;m considering new software it needs to be able to do things other software cannot! Might be a good topic for future blogs!
~Ed]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, it would appear to me, that even though there are some great options to use with Exposure 5, I think other than the scratchy film presets, everything shown can just as easily be accomplished using Lightroom. Anytime I&#8217;m considering new software it needs to be able to do things other software cannot! Might be a good topic for future blogs!<br />
~Ed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
