<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Exposure X5 is Here!	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://exposure.software/blog/2019/exposure-x5-announcement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://exposure.software/blog/2019/exposure-x5-announcement/</link>
	<description>Simple Tools. Simply Beautiful.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2019 14:48:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Jimmy Beech		</title>
		<link>https://exposure.software/blog/2019/exposure-x5-announcement/#comment-104473</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jimmy Beech]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2019 14:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://site.exposure.software/?p=32160#comment-104473</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://exposure.software/blog/2019/exposure-x5-announcement/#comment-104387&quot;&gt;Emi&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks for the feedback, Emi. I&#039;ll make sure the design team hears your suggestions about masking improvements.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://exposure.software/blog/2019/exposure-x5-announcement/#comment-104387">Emi</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks for the feedback, Emi. I&#8217;ll make sure the design team hears your suggestions about masking improvements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Emi		</title>
		<link>https://exposure.software/blog/2019/exposure-x5-announcement/#comment-104387</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2019 18:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://site.exposure.software/?p=32160#comment-104387</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Amazing update!
One thing about 3D masking that maybe you can work on for next update is how it should work across layers.

For example, if I wanted to replace the sky I select the sky with the color constraint, make changes and looks amazing. Now, if I wanted to duplicate the layer to work on the bottom of the photo, for buildings or landscape, if I invert the Mask produced by the color constraint, the mask would be different on the sky and it will not mask the sky completely like I have on the first layer, because the stuff was already already changed from the original layer and then the colors are not the same as the first layer.

This is the way it should work since it is a color constraint, so it does a great way so it can do multiple photos like you showcased in your video about color of the skin, but it seems like not all photos need that feature enable all the time. Maybe find a way to transform the color constraint in a normal mask? or maybe a button to bypass the color constraint so it can only grab the photo without any changes? so the user decides when to use what and be able to invert masks and multiple layers without problems.

It is a great update! so congratulations. Next step in masking should be to make the brush smarter to pick similar colors to make it easier to select objects and maybe masking with shapes. But the color constraint is a great feature to have! I hope it can be improved so it can be used on any photo and any layer and works in any user needs.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing update!<br />
One thing about 3D masking that maybe you can work on for next update is how it should work across layers.</p>
<p>For example, if I wanted to replace the sky I select the sky with the color constraint, make changes and looks amazing. Now, if I wanted to duplicate the layer to work on the bottom of the photo, for buildings or landscape, if I invert the Mask produced by the color constraint, the mask would be different on the sky and it will not mask the sky completely like I have on the first layer, because the stuff was already already changed from the original layer and then the colors are not the same as the first layer.</p>
<p>This is the way it should work since it is a color constraint, so it does a great way so it can do multiple photos like you showcased in your video about color of the skin, but it seems like not all photos need that feature enable all the time. Maybe find a way to transform the color constraint in a normal mask? or maybe a button to bypass the color constraint so it can only grab the photo without any changes? so the user decides when to use what and be able to invert masks and multiple layers without problems.</p>
<p>It is a great update! so congratulations. Next step in masking should be to make the brush smarter to pick similar colors to make it easier to select objects and maybe masking with shapes. But the color constraint is a great feature to have! I hope it can be improved so it can be used on any photo and any layer and works in any user needs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
